Democratic Debate
I just watched the Democratic Debate with Clinton, Sanders, and O'Malley.
It was very interesting in not only hearing their views and the ways they would solve various problems, but their actions, body language, and behavior.   
My observations are as follows (in alphabetical order):
 
Clinton 
Although she was the most verbal, she came on as a bully, constantly interrupting Sanders and talking over both of the moderators.   She practiced a lot of self control to keep from crossing the line of showing her to be the shrew that we know her to be, even shouting to be heard when someone else was speaking.   Her body language made me think that she was either not being very truthful and had a more devastating agenda.   She was pretty scary at times.  In spite of that, she showed that she was not only extremely passionate and driven in her bid to become President and that she was a powerful candidate.
Sanders
He came off as being the most sincere and believable of the three candidates.   Also, being very knowledgeable, his proposals were too extremely socialistic.   He seemed very likable, as though he was a friend just sharing his point of view.
O'Malley
Even though he was given the least amount of time to talk, his proposals made the most sense.   In addition he had the most experience in solving some of our social problems while he was a Mayor and the Governor.   The problem that I have with him was that he showed no power or strength compared to the others.

The bottom line (for me) was that there really weren't any winners or losers in this debate.
Obviously, O'Malley won't win the nomination and Sanders doesn't have as big a campaign machine as Clinton.   If Sanders will just ask us if we want Obama 2.0 then vote for Clinton.  If we're finally tired of the way Washington is working then we should vote for him.
 
   

Does History Repeat Itself ?

In 1941, when the United States was attacked by the Japanese, our President immediately did two things.   First, he declared WAR (having Congress vote for it), then he had all of the Japanese living in this country, rounded up and put in Internment Camps.
By taking the Japanese (good or bad) out of society, we had no militant (or radical) Japanese doing any kind of attacks on our civilians.
So, why isn't our President doing the same thing with the muslim population ?   Why hasn't he asked Congress (oh, I forgot...he disregards Congress) for a Declaration of War (France has done it) against ISIS ?   Why is he reluctant to round up this islamic evil and put them in Internment Camps ?
It's obviously a good idea.   However, in this era of political correctness, who will step up first and say it the way it is ?   All muslims are dedicated to the overthrow of Democracy, our Constitution, our freedom, and most of all, all the religions that are practiced here.
These most recent attacks by muslims aren't going to be the last of them.   If our leaders in Washington are doing nothing to stop this, then it is left in the hands of the rest of us.   All muslims must either be put out of our country or interred.   As far as islam is concerned, due to the fact that it is not a religion, it must be made illegal to observe it.   All mosques must be torn down and any schools teaching sharia law must be shut down.   We must rid our country of this cancer called islam before it's too late.
I challenge anyone in Congress to do anything about this threat to the American way of life.
Why has our President condoned islam to the point where we are all asked yo "be vigilant" ?
Why do I as a free American have to constantly be looking over my shoulder to see if it's the next attack happening ?
Get those muslims and their sympathizers out of the United States.   Don't wait, start today as each day that goes by, there are more of them and the threat grows bigger.
 

So, now we both know.
In this world of political correctness, we can't say that there are "good" people or "bad" people.   When it comes to muslims, we either call them "moderate" or "radical".
The truth is that there are no "good" muslims.   The ones that are called "moderate", all want you dead.   The ones that are called "radical" will kill you.
The radical (or radicalized) muslims are already creating chaos with their bombings and mass shootings.   The moderate muslims have another scheme.   They are reproducing at an alarming rate so as to become an overwhelming majority in the worlds population in order to instill sharia law worldwide.
Again.....
                    A good muslim wants you dead; a bad muslim will kill you !